For transcript of this vlog click below
Bisous français,
Der Sankt
After translating some opinionated vlogs for and against the “Deaf-Mute” title being labeled upon the Deaf, I was inspired to do another vlog.
I want to tell you a story. When I was a young kid in Virginia School for the Deaf, I came across a video that I would never forget. The video was a short collection of ASL poetry by Ella Mae Lentz (titled, “The Treasure.”). A couple of poems never left my heart from the very first time I saw it.
It was the poems she wrote in thin air that made tears swell up in my eyes; at that point, I was never prouder to be Deaf, that ASL is my one and only true language. Her ASL, her fluidity, her choice of words, ah, it is just enough to make you want to melt. That is something reserved for these who are truly Deaf-Mutes. My houseparents who were once my parents’ houseparents had the same flair. How?
One of Ella’s poems explained it quite clearly—Gallaudet brought ASL to the Deaf, not oralism, SEE, cued speech, or even PSE. Later on in Deaf history, the majority decided against ASL—we the deaf-mutes shut ourselves off with the rest of them and preserved years and years of history, culture, information, and the language. Later on, after years have passed, we opened up the doors once again—after noticing that the majority seemed to accept ASL.
Upon opening the doors, we learned that their intention was to use ASL in order to incorporate English in the Deaf. ASL was not being treated as a language. Again, the core community, the deaf-mutes, shut the doors and locked them all out. Not because we do not like them or have anything against them. We did this to preserve what we have. The Deaf community today owes their existence to the deaf-mutes who were defiant and signed in dorms with their peers regardless of the ASL ban. We kept traditions of our history alive by exchanging ideas, stories, and values with our friends. Who, then, passed it on to newer generations.
I still remember the stories they told. “Before you born, long time ago, ASL not allow! Have ruler big will bang your hand will. Sign, Bang! Sign, BANG! Serious business. Teacher all hearing, oral. Red stripe all over, sore—painful, sometimes one two days! Can’t go home. Only home once month, parents hearing don’t care do do school. Not important.”
They worked hard to preserve everything. Now it is up to me to pass on these information, stories, history, and language to the next generation. They gave me the “Treasure,” and in me it will never die. Nowadays, there is a new term—“hearing impaired.” This is the wish of the majority—political correctness. I have many many times demanded that I be called “Deaf” instead of “hearing impaired.” Also, I have yet to see a doctor tell a hearing parent this:
“Your child is deaf.”
Most of them goes to say “hearing impaired.” That is a negative term, much too negative in my opinion. Impaired. No. Now, Deaf-Mute, uhmm. When I sign, I do not speak. I make it a point that it is nearly impossible to do both. It’s like writing in French with your right hand and English with your left.
It was the core ASL users that fought to remove deaf-mute because the term indicated that it is important to be able to hear and speak. We fought years to remove that implications—the oralists fought against us, the hearing parents fought against us, pretty much everyone outside the core fought against us.
Now we broke that barrier. “Deaf-Mute” is ours to reclaim. Now the word does not imply that we need to speak or hear—no. The word represents the fact that we do not hear nor speak with our voices. Our muteness gives way to ASL, separating the two languages.
Some might argue that term is being inconsiderate of the other sections of the Deaf community—i.e., oralists, hearing parents, etc. How is that? We are a community with our set of values, culture, and standards. Why are we being asked to adjust and be open to them who want to join? This is OUR community, in order to join, THEY must have an open mind. They cannot walk in our community and tell us to change, what norms we must accept, destroy years of accomplishment that we have done.
No.
It is them that need to walk in our community with an open mind. It is them that need to understand that they know NOTHING, that we are the experts. We are the ones with years of experience and years of modification to ensure that the community is open to newcomers but does not change our traditions, our culture, and our stance. I will never allow hearing parents come to me and tell me that I need to be accepting of Cochlear Implants in Babies.
How many babies actually became hearing and how many did not? With that failure rate, no business would continue to operate…and yet, they do. The success rate of fluency in ASL is nearly 90% (estimation of mine of course) not only that, out of that 90% success rate, nearly all of them are familiar with the English language via ASL.
You’re telling me that we need to open our minds? Accept their concerns and make adjustments? We have lived in years and years of failure: Milan Conference, Alexander Graham Bell, CI, eugenics, and all that. Failures after failures because we had to be sure their concerns were met.
No more.
Our success rate has spoken, again and again and again. It is time for us Deaf-Mutes to lay down the law and say—you come in our community with an open mind—not with the intent to change or improve (by means of “normalizing” us) but with the intent to learn and advocate for our causes.
Deaf-Mutes unite and preserve the Treasure we are constantly at the brink of losing.
Bisous,
Der Sankt
29 responses so far ↓
The One and Only Ridor // February 25, 2007 at 1:11 am
You know, you made me feel good that there is another blogger that hails from VSDB.
R-
dersankt // February 25, 2007 at 1:14 am
of course, we virginians know how to deliver our news and opinions
Der Sankt
Carl Schroeder // February 25, 2007 at 1:55 am
You’re amazing! Did you know that I was a guest speaker for the Jr. NAD at VSDB twice in my life. I love VSDB people!
ChrisH // February 25, 2007 at 2:52 am
Total communication (TC), a term coined by Roy Holcomb in 1967. In fact, He is deaf.
All you want me to get rid of him who was invented Total communication.
I’d rather “deaf”
DE // February 25, 2007 at 5:28 am
Ben- you hit it outta the field!!!!
Another good reason why we should reclaim “Deaf-Mute”…
It’d piss off the AGB Association.
Jia // February 25, 2007 at 7:57 am
Very true… Being labeled as “Deaf-Mute” does make Deafies’ souls go away! We must not let it go away!!…
I do still remmy ya as a pre-school kid at my alma mater – u were a very bright student!
Another VSDB alumnus
Aidan Mack // February 25, 2007 at 2:12 pm
I enjoyed your vlog and critical thinking.
I am still researching about the “Mute”. I realized that my uneasy feelings were coming from Aristotle. Right now I am reading a book about Socrates and Plato and their views on the Mute.
A Question: Socrates and Plato are hearing philosophers and they named us Deaf and Mute. Before they discovered us, what did a Deaf group name us?
For now, I still call myself Deaf and I don’t use my voice.
If people ask me why some Deaf people call themselves Deaf and Mute, I will explain the fact that they wanted to reclaim Deaf and Mute because Mute is not a bad thing to use. The mute means we don’t speak. We use our hands to communicate. Is that correct?
I respect people who want to name themselves as Deaf and Mute. But I hope Deaf and Mute will respect us that we rather name ourselves as Deaf. And it wont create any division in our community.
Aidan
mishkazena // February 25, 2007 at 3:52 pm
I share with Adian’s sentiments on the importance of mutual respect among deaf people. I definitely respect deaf people’s wishes about labeling themselves DeafMute. However, for myself, I am most comfortable with the label Deaf.
dersankt // February 25, 2007 at 5:05 pm
Mishka,
I notice there are a lot more anti-sentiments with the term “Deaf-Mute” in spite of the fact that the coinage of the term has been justified. What bothers me is this:
Those who spoke against it (save for a few, of course) were almost dismissive. Respect is a hard word to fight. I can understand why people wish to be labeled just “Deaf;” but, I do not understand the reasoning for the anti-sentiments against that word.
Like I pointed out, I was born into the core Deaf community. I was there when the older people sat down and decided to tell stories of their times…I was there when they had a shine in their eyes when they said “They bang bang my hand. Me later night sign ASL same.”
They did not think at the time, oh what about their concerns? What about their understanding of our culture? They did not do that. Now, my ASL is based on generation after generation of Virginians. None of this was written down or preserved.
These histories, the stories, the richness of culture and way of life is now in people like me. My story did not start in Gallaudet–or a Deaf School. My story began at birth. I preserve this fiercely, like a tiger with her cubs. More and more, I’m beginning to notice that the Deaf community is getting diluted.
I won’t speak against that.
the survival of the community rests on the core members whether the rest of the world likes it or not. Your comment seemed a bit dismissive at the least, not to be insulting to you or whatever…
I would like to know why you prefer the “Deaf” label? Do you see “Deaf-Mute” as negative? Do you speak when you sign? What is your argument against Ella Mae’s analysis of the sign “Deaf” — she is not wrong in saying that the sign does mean “Deaf-Mute.” Also, she is not wrong in saying that we are fooling ourselves by saying the sign means “Deaf.”
I’d like to see your arguments for that rather than using the word “Respect” and “preference” to stop whatever debate there is because, again, these words are hard to fight. Personally, I don’t think I did anyone any disrespect in my vlog–just presenting my arguments.
Der Sankt
Barb DiGi // February 25, 2007 at 5:07 pm
Hey Ben..I would love to get a hold of that statistic showing that there is a 98% failure, 2% success rate by CI users so where did you get this info?
Like you coming from a deaf family and having intelligible speech skills, so does that mean you call yourself deafmute at a certain time and when using Spoken English (without signs) you are not? Isn’t it like having two split personalities, heh?
Using SimCom sucks but it is still widely used in deaf educational practices unfortunately. We still have a long way to go.
Michele // February 25, 2007 at 5:14 pm
I myself am not comfortable in labeling myself “deaf-mute”, it sounds so old fashioned to me.
Once people label us as “deaf-mute” , I always feel negative about it. It is like calling us “deaf-dumb”. I felt very proud and still am today about calling myself Deaf. When I was growing up, we were always called, “hearing impaired’, I hated that word so when I learned ASL and entered in deaf college, I started to call myself Deaf and that came as a comfort to me. Now if we were to call ourselves, “deaf-mute”, it is like going back to old days. We don’t really know how deaf people lived in those days, you read books written about codas, they described deaf people suffering so much and that they had to defend their families and all that. Something to consider. Why would we want to label ourselves, “deaf mute” when it created a lot of hardships and difficulty for many deaf people in the old days. That is my perspective so I could be wrong.
dersankt // February 25, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Barb
i said it was my estimate.
Der Sankt
dersankt // February 25, 2007 at 5:32 pm
Michele,
i did not read about the hardships of the Deaf during the old times. I met these people. I grew up around them. When they say “Deaf-Mute” the implications then are much different than the implications Ella presented.
It’s almost like the “N” word with the Black community.
About CODAs…there’s something interesting you should know. I’m Deaf and I am gay. One time a while ago, with my Deaf roommate and a hearing ex boyfriend. I was holding his hand walking down the street…This is New York, not America…All of a sudden, the Ex got upset and start screaming at someone behind me..
I knew right away, someone said a remark about us being gays. Now see the only one who heard it was the only one who got upset. Yes, CODAs might see that Deaf suffered..but is it as bad as they think?
that’s the question.
Der Sankt
ChrisH // February 25, 2007 at 6:02 pm
“I myself am not comfortable in labeling myself “deaf-mute”, it sounds so old fashioned to me.
Once people label us as “deaf-mute” , I always feel negative about it”
I feel the same your statment. I remembered when I was a little boy. Deaf woman taught me to say ” never deafmute.”
Michele // February 25, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Hi Ben,
Well a lot of things came in my mind. I am a Deaf mom of two kids. Supposedly I decided to tell them from now on to call me “Deaf mute”, of course they will ask me questions. Then when they have hearing friends over, their friends may ask them why is your mom mute, why cannot she talk, is her voice box broken and all that? And then maybe one day forgetting that I call myself “deaf mute”, I instantly call out to my hearing children and their friends from the basement to come up to first floor, their friends may be baffled and say, “Hey, I thought your mom could not talk, I heard her calling out to us, I am confused!”. What do do??? It best to call myself Deaf, simple as that. Why create more complications for my hearing children and the public out there. Also deaf mute equates to deaf dumb — b ack in the days, deaf-dumb was the same as deaf mute but now people have a different meaning of dumb.
mishkazena // February 25, 2007 at 7:43 pm
Der, I am sorry you perceive my comment as dismissive as it was never my intention to.
I’ve left in another blog a comment that I totally understand Ella’s reasoning and that I have no problem accepting some people’s preferences in calling themselves deaf mute.
However, this isn’t the correct term for me as I am not mute. I grew up oral and didn’t learn sign language until I went to college. According to others, I sign ASL fluently and it’s my most preferred communication. But also use my voice when I speak to hearing people. Therefore I prefer the term Deaf.
By the way, I hope some day you will tell us stories what the deaf oldsters shared with you about the old days.
dersankt // February 25, 2007 at 11:14 pm
Mishka,
I’m sorry for accusing you of being dismissive. I didn’t realize you had already commented about this in another blog.
With your argument, I agree with you. Deaf-Mute might not be the best term for you.
I should start a vlog series on the old stories des sourds. that’d rock.
Der Sankt
Mishka Zena // February 26, 2007 at 2:42 am
Cool. As there is little documentation on the personal history of deaf people in deaf schools in the old days, these stories will be very valuable. They can be archived for deaf people and scholars to study for decades. I definitely will be looking forward to these stories
IamMine // February 26, 2007 at 7:55 pm
Ben,
Here is my response to your vlog and also about Ella’s DeafMute. I’m adding some about my experiences.
Be warned that it’s an eight minutes long vlog… so please don’t feel obligated to watch all of it.
Like Jay said, you have the power to ‘x’ me out!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=8X8d6elEZs0
BEG // February 26, 2007 at 9:30 pm
Yeah, I don’t label myself Deaf-Mute because I speak, every day. I grew up oral, so it doesn’t seem an accurate description of me. I am deaf, I have no problem with that. But I think Ella had excellent points to make, and if I signed exclusively or predominantly I’d probably be off and running with it myself…
IamMine // February 26, 2007 at 9:35 pm
I had posted a comment above you BEG – but it has a link, so it’s waiting for approval.
I was talking about how I felt about Deaf Mute and also my CI experiences – responses between the Deaf Community and the CI community.
I also sent a link to DeafRead as well.
I hope I am not stepping on any toes, but rather providing my perspective on this.
dersankt // February 27, 2007 at 12:57 am
You didn’t step on any toes. I loved your vlog–seriously. I’m going to do a response! You are beautiful! You should vlog more!
Your ASL is beautiful. Easy to follow and quite alluring. Keep it up!
Der Sankt
ToddE // February 27, 2007 at 6:27 pm
Just re-read the posting again. (I’ll admit to the cardinal sin of breezing through the posting the first time around!)
Frankly speaking, this discussion is counterproductive and goes contrary to the principles of Deafhood. Yes, the core of the Deaf community is comprised of people who exclusively use ASL. But, the Deaf community is so much larger than that, and the Deafhood concept actually expands on this, to include Deaf people of all stripes and backgrounds.
As for me, I think I’ll just stick to the word, ‘Deaf’. A whole lot less confusing and truly gets the point across. I can understand Ella’s point about reclaiming ‘Deaf-Mute’, but I would only go as far as to suggest its usage, if at all, to be internalized within the Deaf community.
etlp // February 28, 2007 at 1:57 am
ben, well explained in asl essay format!
Jean Boutcher // March 2, 2007 at 3:26 am
MZ,
I wrote about “deaf-mute” somewhere on Ben Vess’s blogsite. After reading yours and other commenters (vide supra), it is necessary for me to make myself more clear. Those who have lost hearing late in life and have somehow retained speech that is understood clearly by strangers are the ones who are not deaf-mute. Those who have lost hearing before age of five and have received speech training are the ones who are lied to by teachers that their speech is understood by people of ALL walks of life. In actuality, they are still deaf-mute –no matter
how many times their parents and teachers and close friends have told them how excellent their speech is. Yes, it is bloody true that deaf oralists
feel as if they were crushed under the Empire State Building once a brutally honest person who does not know them will tell them the truth that their speech is unintelligible! “Why do my mother and father understand me perfectly?”
You might say. Yes, they do, but it is because they are familiar with your (deaf) voice and appreciate that you try to do your best to speak.
What’s That You Said? » Blog Archive » treasures // April 2, 2007 at 8:18 pm
[...] me as I attempt to sort through this. I’ve been mulling over Der Sankt’s Treasure posts here and here. And then coincidentally I’ve been reading Forbidden Signs which notes that in the [...]
akram // October 28, 2007 at 8:54 am
Peace and you
Brothers in the human rights organization Mahtermum
Greetings and good medical post
Nahtkm note that I called deaf, and I had a secondary Assembly of the Republic of Yemen, and the preparedness, and the desire to complete the Dralti university, where, and that the browser have private university in Yemen (for the deaf and dumb), Alzerovi physical harm, which for me to Atzmh completed university studies abroad I ask you to the distinguished, and we knew that you provide a lot of help and assistance to this category of people with special needs, such as the deaf and dumb and other given at the level of Arab and Islamic states and the hope of God then you in providing assistance to me to complete university studies abroad
Anna university Alchks
Please accept my sincere greetings and thanks
Applicant
Deaf and dumb / Akram Mohamed Saleh
Jan Kelley // February 13, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Hello Der Sankt,
I came across your article about the term “deaf-mute” while trying to find out what term I should use in a book I am about to publish. It is a guide book to old Paris where I give a description of a building that was an Institut National des Sourd-Muets during the 18th century. I need to find a translation for this and the only one given is “deaf-mute”. I try in my book to always use terms that cause no offence and I am not sure what term I should use. You say that the term “deaf-mute” should be reclaimed, but do you think if I use it in my book it would be seen as offensive. If you have some advice on what I should say I would be most grateful.
Many thanks – and best wishes – Jan Kelley
Jane // February 10, 2009 at 10:45 pm
pic of donks caprice
boondock saints 2 trailer
mickey james nude movies
nuevo bocalista de kpaz la sierra
carmelo anthony cheated on lala
tiger striped pitbulls pics
fire emblem sprite sheet
download mugen fighter jam
pro ana tips and tricks anorexic
deferred comp nyc
pictures of brindle pitbulls
famous players silver city oakville
mugen dbz character
keough playboy pics
miley cyrus home phone number
pics of bob hairstyles
printables picture sudko
where were you keisha coles
harris county jail
whitakers gun shop